Interpretable Foundations for Trustworthy Agentic AI
Published:
Agentic artificial intelligence systems promise autonomous adaptation and self-directed problem solving, yet their adoption in regulated domains hinges on verifiable transparency. In recent deployments I have observed that practitioners still rely on coarse attribution estimates derived from gradient saliency maps, even though these signals often collapse under distributional drift. I argue that an interpretable agentic stack must start with causal specification of decision objectives. Structural causal models provide a formal scaffold that distinguishes policy intent from the mutable patterns surfaced by data-driven planners. By encoding policy constraints as counterfactual queries, it becomes possible to debug agent trajectories with surgical precision.
